Scripture: Mark 10:2-16
Preached 10/04/2015
Matt[1]
worked at a restaurant that a famous television actor loved. Every time the actor made a reservation the cooks picked
out the day’s best steak. The bartender pulled a second bottle of his- the
actor’s favorite Scotch. Table number one was set aside. And then, two
hundred diners, waiters, drinkers all leaning in, eager to be seen by a TV
star.
The last time Matt saw the
actor, he devoured attention as he pretended to ignore it. He ate and told
crude jokes and drank enough liquor to float a small boat. It was a hot night.
He was blurry eyed. He looked sad and red and heavy. Everyone in the dining
room and crowded around the bar did. A sweaty, drunken congregation,
star-struck, depressed, each member hungry for some glory, all of them looking
in the wrong direction.
The moment was broken by sounds from the kitchen. The Prince song "U Got the Look" blaring out of a tinny boom-box and unhinged, outrageous laughter. The dish dogs! How dare they intrude on the star’s meal! The manager glared. The dish room is for chronic alcoholics, kids with no work experience- not the important likes of TV stars. Matt burst in to quiet them.
The moment was broken by sounds from the kitchen. The Prince song "U Got the Look" blaring out of a tinny boom-box and unhinged, outrageous laughter. The dish dogs! How dare they intrude on the star’s meal! The manager glared. The dish room is for chronic alcoholics, kids with no work experience- not the important likes of TV stars. Matt burst in to quiet them.
It was a trap! Not the dish
room. Our scripture reading this morning. Jesus is in the middle of a trap that
the Pharisees have tried to lay for him. The Pharisees are scholars of the law,
nitpicky and legalistic lawyers who are more than a little bit self-righteous.
They believe they have all the right answers, and they can prove it, and anyone
else with a different opinion is clearly just not educated enough. And this
Jesus guy who has come along, and who had been teaching differently than they
are, and he’s eroded some of their celebrity status. Fewer people are coming to
them for answers, and fewer are respecting the high authority they claim.
They don’t like Jesus, and
they don’t like what he has to say. So they lay a trap for him with their best
trick question. “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?” They ask. They’re
attempting to get Jesus to take sides here. Because in their eye’s there’s a
pretty straightforward answer in scripture, in Deuteronomy, and it’s yes. A man
is permitted in Deuteronomy 24 to give his wife a bill of divorce if he finds
something “objectionable” about her. But the two main schools of interpretation-
Shammai and Hillel, if you’re interested- had been disputing exactly what this
meant for years.
Jesus acknowledges the
scriptural allowance for divorce, but then goes on to give a counterpoint,
citing the Genesis text about the joining of two into one, and “let no one
separate”.
Now, before we go any further,
I want to say that I know this passage has been used as a clobber passage
against many people, and probably against a good number of you. First and
foremost, I am sorry that anyone has done that in the name of God or the
Church. It is wrong, and they were wrong. What Jesus is saying here is not that
divorce and remarriage go against the will of God and are awful and make you an
adulterer. Let’s delve deeper to see what he is actually saying.
Divorce in the first century
was very different from divorce as we know it today. In the first century-
that’s Jesus time- marriage was a property arrangement, in which a woman ceased
to be the property of her father and instead became property of her husband. Marriages
were arranged, and a woman had next to no say on who her husband would be.
In these marriages, a man was
the only one who could initiate a divorce. And, using that Deuteronomy passage,
at least the Hillel interpretation, he could pretty well divorce his wife for
any reason. Rabinically accepted reasons for divorce included childlessness,
failure to complete household tasks, even burning bread.
As a divorced woman, her
future was bleak. She had almost no chance at remarriage. Economic
opportunities for divorced women did not exist, and her two options for
survival were prostitution or begging. There were very few childless marriages
in those days, and the children the marriage had produced would go with the
woman. She was not only supporting herself, but attempting to put food on the
table and a roof over the head of her now husbandless family.
Meanwhile, the former
husband’s life continued as normal, he kept the money and the property, he had
fewer mouths to feed, and there was not a stigma about his remarriage should he
feel the urge to do so.
This ancient divorce created
two classes of people- those who mattered: that would be the men, who could end
the marriage at will, who were financially stable, and whose life went on quite
easily after a divorce. TV celebrities. And then there was the second class of
people: the women. They could not leave an abusive marriage, nor some we would
consider adulterous today. They could be dismissed at will for burning the
toast, and if dismissed, were left destitute and with a very bleak future. Dish
dogs, at best.
It’s pretty clear that Jesus,
while using the word divorce, is condemning a practice that is much different
that the divorce we know today. To be fair, I believe that Jesus would object
to the fact that men still tend to have improved financial statuses after
divorce while women have diminished financial statuses. I believe his heart
would hurts for the pain that unhealthy relationships cause, and that the
ending, even if a good ending, an amicable one cause because God wants us all
to be in healthy, life affirming, just and loving relationships, marriages and
other relationships.
So to say, based on this
statement of Jesus that he does not permit divorce and remarriage, is just
awful biblical scholarship, and also wrong. What Jesus objects to is any action
that reinforces the idea that there are different classes of people- those who
matter and those who do not. What Jesus objects to is the discarding of certain
people as if their lives don’t matter. What he objects to- as he makes the
point by bringing a child, the one with the least status among them- is any of
God’s beloved children being left to starve, to fend for themselves, to have to
beg or sell themselves just to be able to survive. The divorce Jesus objects to
is not the one that ends an unhealthy marriage. The divorce he objects to is
any time we attempt to divorce ourselves from our responsibility to make sure
that all of our brothers and sisters are being treated with loving justice, and
that we treat them that way as well.
Matt burst into the dish room
to tell them to be quiet, he burst out of
a trap. He burst out of the trap of the dining room that said the TV star was
the one who mattered, and everyone else ranked lower. What Matt found in that trap-bursting
dish room was a college student named Roy cracking up as a developmentally
disabled teenager named Mike drenched him with a spray gun. Next to them, the
occasionally homeless dishwasher named Art was doubled over with laughter. And Prince
sang along. It was pure glee.
Jesus would much rather be
much rather hang out with the dish dogs, the outcasts, the downtrodden. His
heart is with those most vulnerable members of society, and on this world
communion Sunday we remember our responsibility to them, no matter how far they
may be away from us. The homeless in our city, the refugees fleeing Syria. The
hungry in our neighborhoods, and the starving in Guatemala. Those affected by
violence and brutality here, and those whose lives are torn apart by violence
in Sudan. And where Jesus’ heart is, there our hearts are to be also. Not just
our hearts, but our prayers, our words, our actions, and yes, even our money,
for to such belong the kingdom of heaven so if we want to experience it we’d better
go where it is on display.
So I encourage you this week,
and in the rest of your weeks to come, to break free from the traps you are in.
To discard the notion that there are people who matter more than others since
Jesus has reminded us we are all in this together. To work on your
relationships, as wonderful as they may be, to see if you can move them a
little closer to just, a little more loving, a little more like the Genesis
text Jesus cites in which equal partners work together for the common good. And
to take those same principles out into the world so that you may be and see his
presence in a world that’s been looking in the wrong direction.
There was joy in the dish room
and false merriment outside it. There was unforced laughter in the dish room
and the thin reassurance of too much booze out on the floor. In the dish room,
joy mattered. Love mattered. Friendship mattered. Worldly status did not. There
was Jesus in the dish room and nothing but his absence at the seat of “honor”
the TV star occupied. Who knew? Jesus did. You do. Show the world. Amen.